|
|
 |
| The Work of San Casciano Val di Pesa, Museo di Arte Sacra |
 |
::
Processional cross
Tuscan Manifacture, Late 14th century - early 15th century |
 |
::
Martyrdom of St. Lucy
Giovan Camillo Ciabilli, Late 17th century |
 |
::
Thurible
Tuscan Manifacture, Dated 1775 |
 |
::
Navicule
Tuscan Manifacture, Dated 1775 |
 |
::
Madonna and Child
Gino Micheli da Castello, Dated 1341 |
 |
::
Sculpted Column
Master of Cabestany, Second half of the 12th century |
 |
::
Chasuble
Tuscan Manifacture, 16th century and late 15th century-16th century |
 |
::
Cope
Tuscan Manifacture, Late 17th century |
 |
::
Madonna and Child
Lippo di Benivieni, Second decade of the 14th century |
 |
::
Coronation of the Virgin
Neri di Bicci, Dated 1476 and 1481 |
 |
::
The Archangel St. Michael and stories from the legend of his life
Coppo di Marcovaldo, 1250-1260 ca. |
 |
::
St. Anthony Abbot, St. Sebastian and St. Rocchus
Master of Tavarnelle, 1510-1515 ca. |
 |
::
Madonna and Child
Ambrogio Lorenzetti, Dated 1319 |
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
| Chasuble |
 |
 |
 |
The damask of the chasuble is designed with plant motifs composed of intertwined branches with acorns and oak leaves. The central column is made of brocatel,
while the lower part is gilded and decorated on the back with a pinkish
coloured ogival design containing thistle flowers. The column on the
front, which forms a cross created by a gold and purple inset in
brocade, has a pattern of two alternate ogival motifs linked by curving
spirals: one contains a stylised thistle flower and the other the scene
of Christ in Pietà,
stylistically close to Florentine painting of the second half of the
16th century. These stylistic observations clearly show that the column
in brocatel was recovered from an older religious vestment, produced by
a Florentine manufacturer between the late 15th and early16th
centuries, and used to make up the chasuble, carried out sometime later
in a 16th century Tuscan workshop.The chasuble is typical of the type
produced in the last decades of the 16th century, when there was a
clear separation between textiles used for decoration, characterised by
large patterns, and those instead designed for clothing in general,
often decorated, as in this case, with many small designs, based on
regularly repeated bunches of flowers or flowering branches.The
decision to reutilise the older piece of material, with its large
ogival stitches, shows how very popular this typical early Renaissance
decorative motif was, which not only continued to be used and produced
for the whole of the 16th century, but also in the early decades of the
17th century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|